<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Farewell to Bad Calls or Just Less Complaining?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesportseconomist.com/2012/09/27/farewell-to-bad-calls-or-just-less-complaining/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesportseconomist.com/2012/09/27/farewell-to-bad-calls-or-just-less-complaining/</link>
	<description>__economic thinking about sports__</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:27:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Belk @ethical behavior</title>
		<link>http://thesportseconomist.com/2012/09/27/farewell-to-bad-calls-or-just-less-complaining/comment-page-1/#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Belk @ethical behavior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportseconomist.com/?p=4291#comment-2804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it is not how good the official refs are, but how bad the replacement refs were.  I love good  football no matter who wins.  It was obvious that was a bad call and for the ref to over rule the guy with a better view than  him just made it worst.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is not how good the official refs are, but how bad the replacement refs were.  I love good  football no matter who wins.  It was obvious that was a bad call and for the ref to over rule the guy with a better view than  him just made it worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
